Global Bankers Destroying Our Society
Posted by: administrator
in Finance And Economy
on Dec 16, 2009
How bankers destroy wealth? Bankers generate profits at the expense of society! Same view, two different perspectives...
The First One:
All the money in circulation is created as a debt. It's impossible to repay a debt with debt. All "fiat money" is created from nothing, even thin air has substance. All "fiat money" is borrowed at interest into circulation. Only the borrowed principal is in circulation. The borrower owes the lender principal plus interest. The interest does not exist. All the accrued interest is greater than the amount of principal in circulation. The debt is impossible to pay off. This is fraud, plain and simple, fraud of biblical proportions.
The Second One:
If you want to see mathematical sophistry that puts tricky derivatives pricing to shame, then look no further than this report from the British think tank. Pay levels often don’t reflect the true value that is being created. As a society, we need a pay structure which rewards those jobs that create most societal benefit, rather than those that generate profits at the expense of society and the environment.
Hospital cleaners are worth more to society than bankers, a study suggests.
Bankers may be good at making money for themselves, and sometimes for their banks, but they are a drain on society, a new study has found. It says they effectively take £7 from the rest of us for every £1 they create. The report says advertising executives and tax accountants destroy even more of society's wealth as they create their own.
The research, carried out by think tank the New Economics Foundation, says hospital cleaners create £10 of value for every £1 they are paid.
It claims bankers are a drain on the country because of the damage they caused to the global economy.
They reportedly destroy £7 of value for every £1 they earn. Meanwhile, senior advertising executives are said to "create stress".
The study says they are responsible for campaigns which create dissatisfaction and misery, and encourage over-consumption.
And tax accountants damage the country by devising schemes to cut the amount of money available to the government, the research suggests.
By contrast, child minders and waste recyclers are also doing jobs that create net wealth to the country.
The Foundation has used a new form of job evaluation to calculate the total contribution various jobs make to society, including for the first time the impact on communities and environment.
Eilis Lawlor, spokeswoman for the New Economics Foundation, said: "Pay levels often don't reflect the true value that is being created. As a society, we need a pay structure which rewards those jobs that create most societal benefit rather than those that generate profits at the expense of society and the environment".
She said the aim of the research was not to target individuals in highly paid jobs, or suggest people in low paid jobs should earn more.
"The point we are making is more fundamental - that there should be a relationship between what we are paid and the value our work generates for society. We've found a way to calculate that," she said.
A total of six different jobs were analysed to assess their overall value. These are the study's main findings:
* The elite banker
"Rather than being wealth creators bankers are being handsomely rewarded for bringing the global financial system to the brink of collapse, causing jobs to be lost rather than created and increasing the public debt.
Paid between £500,000 and £80m a year, leading bankers destroy £7 of value for every pound they generate".
* Childcare workers
"Both for families and society as a whole, looking after children could not be more important. As well as providing a valuable service for families, they release earnings potential by allowing parents to continue working. For every pound they are paid they generate up to £9.50 worth of benefits to society."
* Hospital cleaners
"Play a vital role in the workings of healthcare facilities. They not only clean hospitals and maintain hygiene standards but also contribute to wider health outcomes. For every pound paid, over £10 in social value is created."
* Advertising executives
The industry "encourages high spending and indebtedness. It can create insatiable aspirations, fuelling feelings of dissatisfaction, inadequacy and stress. For a salary of between £50,000 and £12m top advertising executives destroy £11 of value for every pound in value they generate".
* Tax accountants
"Every pound that a tax accountant saves a client is a pound which otherwise would have gone to HM Revenue. For a salary of between £75,000 and £200,000, tax accountants destroy £47 in value, for every pound they generate."
* Waste recycling workers
"Do a range of different jobs that relate to processing and preventing waste and promoting recycling. Carbon emissions are significantly reduced. There is also a value in reusing goods. For every pound of value spent on wages, £12 of value is generated for society."
The research also makes a variety of policy recommendations to align pay more closely with the value of work.
These include establishing a high pay commission, building social and environmental value into prices, and introducing more progressive taxation.

















L'analisi e la proposta degli economisti della New Economics Foundation (NEF). "Collegare gli stipendi al contributo di benessere che un lavoro porta alla comunità"
Vale più un addetto alle pulizie, soprattutto se in ospedale, che un banchiere. In più, il secondo crea anche problemi alla società. Sembra tanto l'affermazione fatta da un qualsiasi avventore di bar e invece è la conclusione della ricerca elaborata dal think tank della New Economics Foundation (NEF), un gruppo di 50 economisti famosi per aver portato nell'agenda del G7 e G8 temi quali quello del debito internazionale.
Il NEF ha calcolato il valore economico di sei diversi lavori, tre pagati molto bene e tre molto poco. Un'ora di lavoro di addetto alle pulizie in ospedale, ad esempio, crea dieci sterline di profitto per ogni sterlina di salario. Al contrario, per ogni sterlina guadagnata da un banchiere, ce ne sono sette perdute dalla comunità. I banchieri, conclude il NEF, prosciugano la società e causano danni all'economia globale. Non bastasse questo, valutano ancora gli economisti impegnati in un'etica della finanza, i banchieri sono i responsabili di campagne che creano insoddisfazione, infelicità e istigano al consumismo sfrenato.
"Abbiamo scelto un nuovo approccio per valutare il reale valore del lavoro - spiega il NEF nell'introduzione alla ricerca - . Siamo andati oltre la considerazione di quanto una professione viene valutata economicamente ed abbiamo verificato quanto chi la esercita contribuisce al benessere della società. I principi di valutazione ai quali ci siamo ispirati quantificano il valore sociale, ambientale ed economico del lavoro svolto dalle diverse figure".
Un altro esempio che illustra bene il punto di partenza del NEF è quello della comparazione tra un operatore ecologico e un fiscalista. Il primo contribuisce con il suo lavoro alla salute dell'ambiente grazie al riciclo delle immondizie, il secondo danneggia la società perché studia in che modo far versare ai contribuenti meno tasse.
"La nostra ricerca analizza nel dettaglio sei lavori diversi - si legge ancora nell'introduzione - scelti nel settore pubblico e privato tra quelli che meglio illustrano il problema. Tre di questi sono pagati poco (un addetto alle pulizie in ospedale, un operaio di un centro di recupero materiali di riciclo e un operatore dell'infanzia), mentre gli altri hanno stipendi molto alti (un banchiere della City, un dirigente pubblicitario e un consulente fiscale). Abbiamo esaminato il contributo sociale del loro valore e scoperto che i lavori pagati meno sono quelli più utili al benessere collettivo".
La ricerca, infine, smonta anche il mito della grande operosità di chi ha lavori ben retribuiti e di grande prestigio: chi guadagna di più, conclude il NEF, non lavora più duramente di chi è pagato poco e stipendi alti non corrispondono sempre a un grande talento. Eilis Lawlor, portavoce della NEF, ha voluto però precisare alla BBC: "Il nostro studio vuole sottolineare un punto fondamentale e cioè che dovrebbe esserci una corrispondenza diretta tra quanto siamo pagati e il valore che il nostro lavoro genera per la società. Abbiamo trovato un modo per calcolarlo e questo strumento dovrebbe essere usato per determinare i compensi".